Indigenous stone tools

08 November, 2009

Kimberley Glass / Stone point, red opaque.
Kimberley Glass / Stone point, red opaque.
Image: Rodney Start
Source: Museum Victoria, Indigenous Collections

Question: What tools did Indigenous people use before European contact? What types of stone tools are we likely to see in Australia?

Answer: There are two main types of stone tools in Australia – ground-edge and flaked tools. Stone tools were used for a variety of purposes, in ways similar to those of the steel knives, axes, hammers and chisels we use every day.

Flaked edge tools are made from a variety of materials (including the spectacular and innovative glass Kimberley points), typically high-silica stone such as flint or quartz. A piece of this stone, known as a core, was held and struck with another stone called a hammerstone. The resultant sharp fragment or flake could then be further shaped or sharpened as required. Pressure flaking is a method of shaping the tool where a bone or hardwood tool is pressed against the stone to remove smaller flakes.

Ground-edge tools are made from fracture-resistant stone, such as basalt or greenstone. These materials are able to withstand repeated impact, and were thus suitable for use in objects such as stone axes. The stone was quarried, and then roughly shaped into a tool blank with blows from a hammerstone. The edges were then sharpened and refined by grinding the tool against a coarse, gritty rock. Deep grooves from this grinding can sometimes be seen on sandstone outcrops, usually near water. Ground-edge tools could be held in the hand, or fashioned to be fixed onto a haft or handle.

The most commonly found variety of stone tools in Australia is a variety known as “scrapers”. This is a fairly broad category of wood-working tool, with variations in manufacture and shape dictated by the tool’s use.

Tools were often refashioned into a different purpose, with smaller implements being created from the fragments when a larger tool broke. The process of sharpening and reworking an existing tool is known as retouching.

There are natural processes that can create stones that resemble created stone tools, such as rockfalls and natural weathering. However, if you find what you believe to be a stone tool, you should leave it in place. Aboriginal artefacts and sites are protected by law, as the archaeological significance of a find can be destroyed if an object is removed from its original place. Additionally, stone tools - and the sites where they are found - are important links for Aboriginal people with their culture and history. Removing stone tools from their place can damage the cultural significance of both the site and the object itself.

A number of good examples of Indigenous stone tools are on display in the Discovery Centre at Melbourne Museum.

Further reading

Holdaway, S. and N. Stern, 2004, A Record in Stone: the study of Australia’s flaked stone artefacts.  Canberra: Museum Victoria and Aboriginal Studies Press.

Comments (13)

sort by
Giorgio Chelidonio 29 January, 2011 08:48
Very interesting specimen. I'm greatly interested in understanding australian stone tools: could you suggest links availbale in the Web? Thanking you in advance.
Discovery Centre 2 February, 2011 10:30

Hi Giorgio,

Using terms like ‘Kimberley Points’ or ‘Aboriginal Stone Axes’ in an internet search engine is a good place to start. Educational and Institutional websites tend to yield the most reliable information. Hope this helps.

Dom B 12 May, 2013 15:42
I have inherited some aboriginal stone tools from my great grandfather that he found some years ago. I feel I should respect the wishes of the aboriginal people in the area they were found, can you give me any suggestions on what to do with these artifacts?
Discovery Centre 14 May, 2013 12:19
Hello Dom - the best course of action for you in this case would be to contact Aboriginal Affairs Victoria, as they are best placed to help with this.
Luke 25 October, 2013 09:32
On ya Dom B good to know people are returning artefacts to the Tradtional Areas/Communities
Adrienne 13 May, 2015 16:52
Did Aboriginal people cut meat with flint or quartz tools?
Discovery Centre 30 May, 2015 11:27

Aboriginal tools used for cutting meat or food preparation would have been made from any suitable local materials.  The rocks or minerals used would need to have been hard and capable of being worked into sharp flakes or blades.  Incidentally flint and quartz are not so different in this respect as both are made largely from silica, and there are other similar minerals or rocks which are mainly silica too.  Suitable rocks or minerals found in different places include chert, chalcedony, silcrete, quartzite, and basalt.  For more information see articles such as this one and another. You might also like to investigate your local library system and borrow a copy of A record in stone : the study of Australia's flaked stone artefacts by Simon Holdaway and Nicola Stern.

Rostyslav 19 October, 2015 15:56
Hello, I have got a task to find of advantages and disadvantages of using quartzite as a stone tool. Could you please recommend a link to find answer for my question
wayne wells 17 February, 2016 14:57
I found a strange rock in my backyard in Tasmania.Its got a strange grove in it like its some kind of tool.
Greg Mellow 11 July, 2016 10:52
I have a science class that will be researching flaked tools. Are there any places near Melbourne that flaked tools were made? What rock did they use?
Discovery Centre 11 July, 2016 12:54
Hello Greg - Museum Victoria doesn't supply the sort of information you are looking for, you're instead recommended to contact the Office of Aboriginal Affairs Victoria (OAAV) via their webpage for more information
Matthew 19 October, 2016 10:22
How do you know if you have found an artefact, what kind of features do they have.
job 22 October, 2016 14:58
not sure soz
Write your comment below All fields are required

We love receiving comments, but can’t always respond.